[Icehouse] Extend IGDC Judging?
miyu
xmiyux at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 14:24:50 EDT 2007
I'm with Avri. I was relatively undecided but I think Carl hit the nail on
the head. I know what happens in my classroom if I don't hold them to
deadlines. *shudder*
Having a soft, 2 day grace period though is nice because it keeps it from
being some super-strict thing.
So, I vote no as well.
-Ryan
On 9/18/07, Avri Klemer <avri at surpriselake.org> wrote:
>
> I was genuinely undecided until Carl's email. But on reading this I
> realize
> that precedent is an issue. Next time up, are we going to allow a
> designer
> to enter (or edit) a game after the deadline?
>
> I vote "No".
>
> I think the 2 day buffer ought to satisfy both sides of the fence, as well
> as fence-sitters.
>
> a
>
--
Ora, lege, lege, lege, relege, labora et invenies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.looneylabs.com/pipermail/icehouse/attachments/20070918/ba31d083/attachment.htm
More information about the Icehouse
mailing list