[Icehouse] Extend IGDC Judging?

miyu xmiyux at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 14:24:50 EDT 2007


I'm with Avri.  I was relatively undecided but I think Carl hit the nail on
the head.  I know what happens in my classroom if I don't hold them to
deadlines. *shudder*

Having a soft, 2 day grace period though is nice because it keeps it from
being some super-strict thing.

So, I vote no as well.

               -Ryan

On 9/18/07, Avri Klemer <avri at surpriselake.org> wrote:
>
> I was genuinely undecided until Carl's email.  But on reading this I
> realize
> that precedent is an issue.  Next time up, are we going to allow a
> designer
> to enter (or edit) a game after the deadline?
>
> I vote "No".
>
> I think the 2 day buffer ought to satisfy both sides of the fence, as well
> as fence-sitters.
>
> a
>

-- 
Ora, lege, lege, lege, relege, labora et invenies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.looneylabs.com/pipermail/icehouse/attachments/20070918/ba31d083/attachment.htm


More information about the Icehouse mailing list