[Icehouse] 30 Pointer Alert
Ryan McGuire
kerry_and_ryan at att.net
Sun Mar 4 15:06:32 EST 2007
Ahhh, I see your point now.
You were trying to create a function that allowed the pieces to retain
basically the same proportions in the bigger sizes, even if that meant
having to round the results. I thought you had done the math wrong and had
to do the rounding as a fudge to match the existing dimension. I stand
corrected, or at least enlightened.
You like the 4:7 (~.5714) ratio, huh? My "exact" formulae would approach a
7:12 (~.5833) ratio. You can have yours, I'll have mine.
Ryan
From: "Don Sheldon" <don.sheldon at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Icehouse] 30 Pointer Alert
> On 3/3/07, Ryan McGuire <kerry_and_ryan at att.net> wrote:
>> Except that those formulas don't produce the "standard" dimensions as I
>> understand them.
>
> Yes they do. Check your math again.
> ...
>> Height = (5 + 3x)/8
>> Width = (11 + 7x)/32
>
> But that breaks down severely at higher pips and deforms your pyramids
> away from the beauty of the 4:7 ratio.
More information about the Icehouse
mailing list