[Icehouse] Query: Wiki categories

[James Hazelton]

I guess that's kind of my point.  What qualifies for notecardability?

On 12/21/06, Jeff Zeitlin <icehouse at freelancetraveller.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:00:10 -0500 (EST), "James Hazelton"
> <jameshazelton at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The point of a Wiki is that anyone can update anything, so if you have a
> >catagory to make, go ahead and make it.  I like the idea of a
> Non-Stacking
> >Games catagory; that is, I can see how it would be useful.  However, I
> don't
> >know who goes around writing the rules to games on their notecards to
> bring
> >them along with their single stashes.  Also the matter of what qualifies.
> >ICE-7 contains rules to games I thought for sure were too complex to be
> >reduced down to a card.
>
> Well, it wasn't necessarily that one would actually print out the rules
> on a notecard, but that the rules were simple enough to be playable if
> they were, with the secondary thought that *IF* they wanted to, Looney
> Labs could then market stashes with the rules for any random GIANT like
> they did with Treehouse: put the pyramids (and maybe one die) into a
> tube, and print the rules on the label.
>
> I haven't looked at ICE-7 lately; are the rules on the card(s)
> sufficient to successfully play the game in question?
> _______________________________________________
> Icehouse mailing list
> Icehouse at lists.looneylabs.com
> http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/icehouse
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.looneylabs.com/pipermail/icehouse/attachments/20061221/deaf827f/attachment.htm