[Fluxx] Zombie Fluxx rules questions

[Joseph Pate]

Hi Bryan:

I, for one, believe you have interpreted the rules in each
case (and I think "no" for the dead friends question) the 
same way I would.  Also leads me to think "correctly", but 
that's a matter of interpretation, so I'm interested to see
if any others disagree.

-Joe

> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on  
lists.looneylabs.com
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE  
autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0
> X-Original-To: fluxx at lists.looneylabs.com
> Delivered-To: fluxx at lists.looneylabs.com
> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:54:27 -0400
> From: "Bryan Stout" <bryan.stout at verizon.net>
> To: <fluxx at lists.looneylabs.com>
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-priority: Normal
> Subject: [Fluxx] Zombie Fluxx rules questions
> X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210
> X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.45889 Rule 
breakdown below pts rule name              description ---- 
---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 
HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message 1.00 BSF_SC0_TG035a        
 Message contains invalid style definition
>