[Fluxx] Rich and Poor bonus (Middle Class?)

[Stephanie Cottrell Bryant]

Yes, except that wording the card as "More than everyone else" would  
then be interpreted as "add up the number of keepers everyone else  
has-- if you have more, then you get the bonus."

--Stephanie

On Mar 26, 2007, at 12:00 AM, S Mattison wrote:

> I agree, because, in THAT case, 2 would get BOTH the rich AND the poor
> bonus. We can't have that, because the card does not read
> 'Middle-Class Double-Bonus'. But that's a nice idea for a card, too.
>
> Middle Class Bonus rule: "If you don't have the greatest OR the least
> number of Keepers in play, then you may draw one extra card. Disregard
> this rule if there are only two people playing."
>
> If it said "more than any single person", I could understand, but I
> always understood the card as being "more than everyone else playing",
> as Billy did.
>
> On 3/25/07, Billy Brahma <billybrahma at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Sounds like asking the definition of the word "know" (Dick Cheney)  
>> or the
>> definition of the word "is" (Clinton)...
>>
>> The card reads more or less than anyone else.  Anyone 2 is more  
>> than 1 and
>> less than 3..  only 1 would get the poor bonus... he has less than  
>> anyone...
>> only 3 would get the rich... he has more than anyone..  2 doesn't get
>> anything... he doesn't qualify by anyone...
> _______________________________________________
> Fluxx mailing list
> Fluxx at lists.looneylabs.com
> http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/fluxx
>