[Eco] Andy's recycling article
ginohn
ginohn at comcast.net
Sun Jan 28 12:33:21 EST 2007
I missed this little discussion in a talk page on wikipedia <http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paper_recycling>:
> In one episode of Penn & Teller: Bullshit! the hosts show that it
> is actually better for the environment to take down (and plant) new
> trees instead of recycling paper. The latter supposedly pollutes a
> lot and there aren't really any energy savings going on.
> Could someone please look into these claims and add some
> counterpoints to the current article?
>> Firstly, it must be noted that the particular show mentioned is an
>> entertainment show, factually speaking, it has on many occasions
>> been derided by a number of scientists for distorting their
>> scientific research and for making extremely dubious and often
>> totally unproven claims.
>>
>> Wheras there has been much discussion on this topic, basically all
>> serious published research shows that recycled paper is a lot
>> better for the enviroment. Put simply, the amount of energy that
>> is required to chop the trees down, then transport them, then
>> woodchip them and then turn them into pulp makes recycled paper a
>> lot more energy efficient and enviromentally friendly. Also, new
>> paper requires the use of extremely polluting chemicals like
>> chlorine which are only required in either small amounts, or often
>> not at all, in paper recycling bleeching.
>>
>> Also, continually planted forests contribute to soil erosion and
>> degradation as the nutrients are continually removed with the
>> trees. This means that 'farmed' forests often require the use of
>> large quantities of artificial fertilizers, the production,
>> transportation and regular application of these is extremely
>> energy intensive and enviromentally damaging.
>> Selective use of statistics is often used in such TV shows and in
>> such books to try to claim both paper and other recycling methods
>> are supposably less energy efficient than using raw materials, but
>> no scientifically condoned research has ever shown any of the
>> common recycling processes (i.e. aluminium, glass, paper, plastics
>> & steel) to be less enviromentally friendly or energy inefficient
>> than raw material creation and disposal over the long term. On the
>> contrary, basically all research studies show massive enviromental
>> and energy savings by recycling materials such as paper.
:-j
More information about the Eco
mailing list